Obama and Clinton: disturbed personalities

Barack Obama is the only president in American history that openly defends our enemies and schemes to disarm our citizens. His recent angry rhetoric in the aftermath of the latest Islamist murders in Orlando, Florida blatantly reveal this as reported by New York Times reporters in  the June 15, 2016 print edition. And Mrs. Clinton, the presumptive Democrat presidential nominee he supports, likely will follow his agenda that threatens our security.

Of course, Obama’s and Clinton’s “plan to savage” Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s statements on American security show fear of him and irrational anger toward his common sense talk about protection from our obvious Islamist enemies; Times reporters refer to their “blistering denunciation.”

Shifting attention from his own irresponsible language and actions: ignoring the will of Congress and locating thousands of Middle East Muslims into American States with no ability (or interest) to screen potential terrorists from these populations, Obama insolently calls Mr. Trump “dangerous.” In my opinion, Obama is the biggest internal threat Americans have faced since Abraham Lincoln’s war against our Southern States.

Trump observed that Obama “was more angry at me” than at the murderous Muslim in Orlando.

Obama seems to believe that the violent attacks by Islamists on U. S. soil in recent years can excuse identifying them because they were “American” citizens. But he has never acknowledged that the killers have all been Muslims with known connections to foreign Islamic terrorist groups. They are in America by accident of birth not because they are loyal to this country—which also applies to this president.

Obama “bitterly rejected criticism” of Americans who question his refusal to use the term radical Islam to identify our sworn enemies in the Islamic State and from other Muslim groups.

Hillary Clinton contemptuously calls them “magic words.” But we wonder why she and Obama defend our enemies by refusing to identify them—who they are and where they come from—and the ideology that motivates their murderous acts.

Inexplicably, even some Republican political leaders refuse to accept this reality. House Speaker Paul Ryan joins the delusional Democrat view that the “vast, vast majority of Muslims” are “moderate”…”tolerant”…”peaceful” and our “best allies.” If that is true, why haven’t these “vast” numbers of Muslims throughout the world put a stop to the presumed few who willingly and regularly (for centuries) carry out murder and mayhem on innocent people including other Muslims in the name of their god Allah?

People in civilized Western countries don’t tolerate indiscriminate violence when confronted with it, although some European nations have foolishly allowed mass migrations of incompatible Muslims to settle within their borders–where they now live separate and angry at their hosts.

Muslims are so antithetical to Western civilization that they by definition (Islam means submission) will not assimilate and demand that all others submit to their religious laws.

Obama and Clinton display anger and resentment toward Mr. Trump and millions of his supporters because they know they are wrong on this issue. They risk being labeled traitors to America for sympathizing with our most virulent enemies. So, they change the subject to irrelevant “gun control.”

The nature of evil may sometimes be inexplicable and unpredictable, but it can be mitigated by honestly identifying and containing it. Cultural characteristics, behavioral patterns and historical evidence must be used to reduce the threats from potentially bad people. The liberal multiculturalism agenda now stands in the way of our safety from evil forces.

But we will never be secure and safe from radical Islamists as long as our federal government is controlled by people subversive to the interests of traditional America and its citizens—today’s “progressives” mire their minds in irrational ideological views, bad public policies and hatred for this country as founded.

As psychiatrist Dr. Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr. has written in his book, “The liberal mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness”:

The modern liberal mind, its distorted perceptions and its destructive agenda are the product of disturbed personalities.


About R. E. Smith Jr.

Mr. Smith writes essays and commentary on politics, American history, environment, higher education and culture. He's been published in print media and at blog sites for about 25 years. Smith's formal education includes B.S. and M.S. degrees from the State University of New York and Syracuse University. He has earned a 21-credit hour Certificate in Professional Writing from the University of North Carolina-Wilmington. Training/work experience: NYS Ranger School; U. S. Army, Corp of Engineers; soil scientist and forester with USDA; Assoc. Professor at SUNY; real estate agent; small business owner.
This entry was posted in Irrational Political Views and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s