The following email I received is clever, humorous and the author has some very good and valid points about the value of policing our society, and why we need civilian police.
It does also, however, reinforce the reality that we have too many unnecessary laws in the U. S. that do, in fact, allow (require) the police to “harass” people—including taking their property. Drug use, possessing guns, failure to pay taxes, not wearing a seat belt, even smoking are a few examples and reasons to restrict the freedoms and interfere with the lives of people who intend no harm or threat to anyone.
As this author says, the police have books full of “statutes” that they must follow. Some of these threaten innocent, nonviolent people and are also unfair to the police who must sort it all out and are prone to making mistakes or poor judgment just as we all are—and often spending time and resources on trivial matters while other, higher priority, crimes do not get the attention they deserve.
Except in cases of bad judgment and abusive behavior, we shouldn’t blame the police for too much policing. We have allowed feckless, irresponsible elected officials, sometimes prompted by meddling do-gooders, to bring us to this level of “police state” that now includes militarizing our civilian police forces and often using excessive force.
We should expect (and respect) the police motto: Protect and Serve. The trend toward over-criminalizing virtually everything we do restricts our freedom and results in fear and suspicion of police. And they should not be conditioned to look at everyone as a potential criminal. For their sake, and ours, the vast majority of free, law-abiding citizens can’t afford to let this happen. But we have to deal with it at the source: we have too many harassing government regulations and restrictions.
Recently, the Chula Vista, California Police Department ran an e-mail forum with the local community (a question and answer exchange) with the topic being, “Community Policing.” One of the civilian e-mail participants posed the following question:
“I would like to know how it is possible for police officers to continually harass people and get away with it?”
From the “other side” (the law enforcement side) Sgt. Bennett, obviously a cop with a sense of humor replied:
“First of all, let me tell you this…it’s not easy. In Chula Vista, we average one cop for every 600 people.
Only about 60% of those cops are on general duty (or what you might refer to as “patrol”) where we do most of our harassing. The rest are in non-harassing departments that do not allow them contact with the day to day innocents.
At any given moment, only one-fifth of the 60% patrollers are on duty and available for harassing people while the rest are off duty.
So roughly, one cop is responsible for harassing about 5,000 residents.
When you toss in the commercial business, and tourist locations that attract people from other areas, sometimes you have a situation where a single cop is responsible for harassing 10,000 or more people a day.
Now, your average ten-hour shift runs 36,000 seconds long. This gives a cop one second to harass a person, and then only three-fourths of a second to eat a donut AND then find a new person to harass.
This is not an easy task. To be honest, most cops are not up to this challenge day in and day out. It is just too tiring.
What we do is utilize some tools to help us narrow down those people which we can realistically harass.
The tools available to us are as follow:
PHONE: People will call us up and point out things that cause us to focus on a person for special harassment.
“My neighbor is beating his wife” is a code phrase used often. This means we’ll come out and give somebody some special harassment.
Another popular one: “There’s a guy breaking into a house.” The harassment team is then put into action.
CARS: We have special cops assigned to harass people who drive. They like to harass the drivers of fast cars, cars with no insurance or no driver’s licenses and the like.
It’s lots of fun when you pick them out of traffic for nothing more obvious than running a red light.
Sometimes you get to really heap the harassment on when you find they have drugs in the car, they are drunk, or have an outstanding warrant on file.
RUNNERS: Some people take off running just at the sight of a police officer. Nothing is quite as satisfying as running after them like a beagle on the scent of a bunny. When you catch them you can harass them for hours to determine why they didn’t want to talk to us.
STATUTES: When we don’t have PHONES or CARS and have nothing better to do, there are actually books that give us ideas for reasons to harass folks. They are called “Statutes”; Criminal Codes, Motor Vehicle Codes, etc…They all spell out all sorts of things for which you can really mess with people.
After you read the statute, you can just drive around for awhile until you find someone violating one of these listed offenses and harass them.
Just last week I saw a guy trying to steal a car. Well, there’s this book we have that says that’s not allowed. That meant I got permission to harass this guy. It’s a really cool system that we’ve set up, and it works pretty well.
We seem to have a never-ending supply of folks to harass. And we get away with it. Why? Because for the good citizens who pay the tab, we try to keep the streets safe for them, and they
pay us to “harass” some people.
Next time you are in my town, give me the old “single finger wave.” That’s another one of those codes. It means, “You can’t harass me.” It’s one of our favorites.
Hopefully sir, this has clarified to you a little bit better how we harass the good citizens of Chula Vista.